NET, IAS, State-SET (KSET, WBSET, MPSET, etc.), GATE, CUET, Olympiads etc.: Philosphy MCQs (Practice_Test 65 of 90)
Get top class preparation for competitive exams right from your home: get questions, notes, tests, video lectures and more- for all subjects of your exam.
- Consider the following four links of causal wheel of Buddhism:
- Namarupa
- Samaskara
- Trsna
- Sparsa
- Which is the correct sequence of the above?
- 4 − 3 − 1 − 2
- 2 − 1 − 4 − 3
- 1 − 2 − 3 − 4
- 3 − 4 − 1 − 2
- Which of the following statements are not true of nominalism?
- Universal horseness does exist, but exists in a fictional world, which is the ontological Counterpart of the real world.
- The word ‘horse’ just names an individual horse, and it cannot meaningfully be used when no individual horse is perceived in the vicinity.
- Universal horseness really exists neither in the physical world nor in the mental world.
- Individual horse forming a class or group of horses never add up to universal horseness.
- Select the correct answer using the code given below
- Code:
- 1 and 2 only
- 1,2 and 4 only
- 2,3 and 4 only
- 3 and 4 only
- Code:
- Which one of the following statements is correct? According to Ramanuja, Isvara and Jiva are
- both distinguishable and separable
- neither distinguishable nor separable
- separable but not distinguishable
- distinguishable but not separable
- Consider the following argument of Descartes: ‘Since I know of some Perfections I did not have, it follows of necessity that there was another more perfect being upon which I was dependent and from which I have acquired everything that I have.’ Which one of the following is not implied by the argument given above?
- Something cannot come out of nothing
- The idea of God includes the idea of supreme perfection
- Existence is implied in the very idea of supreme perfection
- The cause must have as much perfection as there is in its effect
- Which one of the following statements is true of both Plato and Aristotle?
- Universals, and not particulars, are real
- Particulars, and not universals, are real
- Both universals and particulars are real
- Neither universals nor particulars are of ontologically higher status than the other
- Consider the following argument: No cow can be found in India. All carnivorous animals are cows. Therefore, no carnivorous animals can be found in India, Which one of the following is correct?
- The argument is invalid because the premises as well as the conclusion are false
- The argument is invalid solely on the ground that conclusion is false
- The argument is invalid because the conclusion is wholly irrelevant to the premises
- The argument is valid because if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true
- A sound deductive argument differs from a valid deductive argument in having which one of the following?
- All false premises and a true conclusion
- All false premises and a false conclusion
- All true premises and a true conclusion
- Some true premises, some false premises and a true con-elusion
- The validity of a particular argument is dependent upon which one of the following?
- Fact
- Form
- Fact and form
- Truth-value
- Which one of the following propositions expresses the relation of a member of a class as being contained as a member in another class?
- All S is P
- Some S is P
- No S is P
- Some S is not P
- If the proposition ‘Some pace bowlers are not temperamental’ is given as false, which of the following is false on the traditional interpretation?
- All pace bowlers temperamental
- No pace bowlers temperamental
- Some pace bowlers temperamental
- Some temperamental persons are pace bowlers
- Which one of the following statements is correct on the modern logic?
- A and E propositions are contraries
- I and O propositions are sub-contraries
- A and I propositions are sub-alternates
- A and O propositions are contradictories
- According to classical logic, general schema of standard from categorical propositions consist of which of the following?
- Subject term, predicate term only
- Predicate term, some form of the verb ‘to be’ subject term
- Subject term, predicate term, some form of the verb ‘to be’ quantifier
- Subject term, predicate term, quantifier only
- Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the code given below the Lists
Table Supporting: NET, IAS, State-SET (KSET, WBSET, MPSET, Etc.) , GATE, CUET, Olympiads Etc. : Philosphy MCQs (Practice_Test 65 of 90) List-I List-II - CESARE
- BARBARA
- DARAPTI
- FESAPO
- 1st figure
- 2nd figure
- 3rd figure
- 4th figure
- A
- B
- C
- D
- 2
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 4
- 3
- 1
- 2
- 2
- 3
- 1
- 4
- 4
- 1
- 3
- 2
- Which of the following valid mood of categorical syllogisms in traditional logic is invalid on the modern Boolean interpretation of categorical syllogisms?
- BOCARDO
- FRESESON
- FESAPO
- DISAMIS
- Which one of the following statements is correct about a valid syllogism?
- A syllogism is valid by virtue of its mood only
- A syllogism is valid by virtue of its figure only
- A syllogism is valid by virtue of the truth of its premises and the truth of its conclusion
- A syllogism is valid by virtue of its both mood and figure