NET, IAS, State-SET (KSET, WBSET, MPSET, etc.), GATE, CUET, Olympiads etc.: Philosphy MCQs (Practice_Test 42 of 90)
Get top class preparation for competitive exams right from your home: get questions, notes, tests, video lectures and more- for all subjects of your exam.
- Which one of the following pairs is correctly matched?
- Match Item 1: Mimamsa
- Match Item 2: Abyatha Khyati
- Match Item 1: Nyaya Vaisesika
- Match Item 2: Akhyati
- Match Item 1: Advaita Vedanta
- Match Item 2: Anivachaniya Khyati
- Match Item 1: Samkhya
- Match Item 2: Sat-Asat Khyati
- Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the code given below the Lists:
Table Supporting: NET, IAS, State-SET (KSET, WBSET, MPSET, Etc.) , GATE, CUET, Olympiads Etc. : Philosphy MCQs (Practice_Test 42 of 90) List-I List-II - Locke
- Spinoza
- Descartes
- Leibnitz
- Pre-established Harmony
- Inter-actionism
- Parallelism
- Representations
- A
- B
- C
- D
- 4
- 3
- 2
- 1
- 1
- 3
- 2
- 4
- 4
- 2
- 3
- 1
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Berkeley makes use of the empiricist doctrines of Locke to establish idealism and thereby to refute
- rationalism and nominalism
- realismand scepticism
- monism and dualism
- materialism and atheism
- An argument must satisfy which one of the following conditions to establish the truth of its conclusion?
- The argument must be valid irrespective of the truth of the premises
- The argument must be valid and its major premise must be true
- The argument must be valid and its minor premise must be true
- The argument must be valid and all its premises must be true
- Which one of the following argument is valid?
- If Sohan has quit the club, then Rohan will need a new dance parter. Therefore, Sohan has quit the club.
- If Sohan has quit the club, then Rohan will need a new dance partner. Sohan has quit the club. Hence, Rohan will need a new dance partner
- If Gopal was physicist, then he was a scientist, Gopal was a scientist. So he was a physicist
- There are one thousand lottery tickets and only one will win. Almost everyone with a ticket will lose. I have a ticket, I will lost.
- An argument is said to be valid in virtue of
- its form
- its contents
- both its form and content
- truth of its conclusion
- Match incorrect below given ones:
- Carvakas-N/A
- Nyaya-Vaisesika
- Sankhya-yoga
- Jainism-N/A
- Which one of the following distinctions exists in Brahman according to Ramanuja
- Vijatiya
- Sajatiya
- Svagata
- Bahya
- Which one of the following is not acceptable to Ramanuja?
- Brahman is qualified
- Brahman is Ishvara
- Jivas merge in Ishwara and have no separate identity
- Jivas is not identical with Bahman
- The view that universals have no existence independently of being thought and are more names, is held by
- Conceptualists
- Realists
- Nominalists
- Critical realists
- Which one of the following statements illustrates Platonic theory of universals?
- Universals alone are real
- Universals and particulars are equally real
- Universals are copies of particulars
- Universals are not real entities but are only concepts
- Match List-I (Statements) with List-II (Fallacies) and select the correct answer:
Table Supporting: NET, IAS, State-SET (KSET, WBSET, MPSET, Etc.) , GATE, CUET, Olympiads Etc. : Philosphy MCQs (Practice_Test 42 of 90) List-I List-II - Aristotle
- Spinoza
- Kant
- Transcendental Unity of Apperception
- Pre-established Harmony
- Unmoved Mover
- Intellectual Love of God
- A
- B
- C
- 2
- 1
- 4
- 3
- 4
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 1
- 3
- 1
- 4
- Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the codes given below the lists:
Table Supporting: NET, IAS, State-SET (KSET, WBSET, MPSET, Etc.) , GATE, CUET, Olympiads Etc. : Philosphy MCQs (Practice_Test 42 of 90) List-I List-II - I and O propositions have existential import
- A and E propositions existential import
- A and E propositions no existential import
- If we use a universal proposition with which we intend to assert existence, we require two propositions; one existential in force but particular, the other universal but not existential in force
- True on the modern (Boolean) interpretation only
- True both on the traditional and modern (Boolean) interpretation
- True on the traditional, but not on the modern (Boolean) interpretation
- A
- B
- C
- D
- 1
- 3
- 2
- 1
- 2
- 1
- 1
- 3
- 1
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 2
- 3
- 1
- 1
- On the moder interpretation of the traditional categorical A, E, I and O, which one of the following statements about their inter-relationships is true?
- A and E remain contraries, and I and O continue to be subcontrarier; but A and O, and E and I cease to be contradictories
- A and E cease to be contraries, and I and O cease to be subcontrariers; and A and O, and E and I remain contradictories
- I and O continue to be subcontraries
- A and E to be contraries
- All soldiers are one hundred per cent dedicated persons. All one hundred per cent dedicated persons are successful. Therefore, some successful persons are soldiers. Considers the following statements:
- This syllogism is valid in Aristotelian logic
- This syllogism is invalid in modern logic
- This syllogism is valid in both
- Aristotelian and modern logics
- Which of the above are correct?
- 1,2 and 3
- 1 and 2
- 2 and 3
- 1 and 3
- Which of the above are correct?